Displaying 181 – 200 of 232

Showing per page

On the riemann zeta-function and the divisor problem

Aleksandar Ivić (2004)

Open Mathematics

Let Δ(x) denote the error term in the Dirichlet divisor problem, and E(T) the error term in the asymptotic formula for the mean square of ς 1 2 + i t . If E * t = E t - 2 π Δ * t / 2 π with Δ * x = - Δ x + 2 Δ 2 x - 1 2 Δ 4 x , then we obtain 0 T E * t 4 d t e T 16 / 9 + ε . We also show how our method of proof yields the bound r = 1 R t r - G t r + G ς 1 2 + i t 2 d t 4 e T 2 + e G - 2 + R G 4 T ε , where T 1/5+ε≤G≪T, T

On the riemann zeta-function and the divisor problem II

Aleksandar Ivić (2005)

Open Mathematics

Let Δ(x) denote the error term in the Dirichlet divisor problem, and E(T) the error term in the asymptotic formula for the mean square of ζ 1 2 + i t . If E *(t)=E(t)-2πΔ*(t/2π) with Δ * x + 2 Δ 2 x - 1 2 Δ 4 x , then we obtain 0 T E * t 5 d t ε T 2 + ε and 0 T E * t 544 75 d t ε T 601 225 + ε . It is also shown how bounds for moments of | E *(t)| lead to bounds for moments of ζ 1 2 + i t .

On the size of L(1,χ) and S. Chowla's hypothesis implying that L(1,χ) > 0 for s > 0 and for real characters χ

S. Louboutin (2013)

Colloquium Mathematicae

We give explicit constants κ such that if χ is a real non-principal Dirichlet character for which L(1,χ) ≤ κ, then Chowla's hypothesis is not satisfied and we cannot use Chowla's method for proving that L(s,χ) > 0 for s > 0. These constants are larger than the previous ones κ = 1- log 2 = 0.306... and κ = 0.367... we obtained elsewhere.

Currently displaying 181 – 200 of 232